Salcido v. Woodbury County (2000)

Iowa’s civil commitment statute is unconstitutional for lack of process to contest placement decisions and no neutral consideration of appeals

Citation: 119 F. Supp.2d 900 (2000)
Court: N.D. Iowa
Date decided: Oct 30, 2000
Longer case name: Maximo SALCIDO, by his next friend, Amelia GILLILAND, Plaintiff, v. Woodbury County, Iowa; Jessie Rasmussen, as Director of the IA Dept Human Svcs; and Thomas L. Vilsack, as Governor of Iowa, Defendants.
Law type: Civil
Jurisdiction level:Federal
State of origin: Iowa
Topic(s):Civil commitment and Mental health
Lists:
Result:Win
Attorneys:Frank Tenuta of Legal Services Corp. of Iowa, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff.
Others involved:
More info:

Case Importance



Case Details

(The syllabus is not part of the opinion, but is a summary prepared by the court reporter as a convenience.)

Iowa’s civil commitment statute was declared unconstitutional on its face because there was no process to contest placement decisions and the board of supervisors were not neutral decision makers to decide appeals.


INTERNAL USE ONLY:
Last modified: 2025-06-10 01:53
Case internal grade: A | Case internal status: OK |
Case internal status notes:
Collections: